Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 Ark. 986 - Murphy v. Marshall

Murphy v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wright v. Lake · Fidelity Deposit Co. of Md. v. Cowan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No conveyance required by the provisions of this act to be recorded shall be valid or binding, except between the parties and their legal representatives, until the same shall have been deposited in the recorder’s office for record; nor even then if shown to be made with intent to defraud prior creditors or purchasers, but shall be void against such prior creditors or purchasers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.