Moody v. Shuffleton’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2007 · most notably Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal. (1943), 140 Cal. App. 2d 278 - Schaefer v. Berinstein (1956)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Berka v. Woodward · 68 Cal. App. 592 - Stockton Plumbing & Supply Co. v. Wheeler · Meyer v. City of San Diego · Adams v. Minor · Foster v. City of Cape May
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The foregoing statutory pronouncements are in consonance with the well-settled policy of the common law and numerous decisions are to be found vigorously enforcing the rule.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The value of the security of said chattel mortgage is therefore increased by the business received by said newspaper . . . and said H. L. Moody is benefited thereby.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.