Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 CALAPP3D 201 - Roemer v. Pappas

Roemer v. Pappas’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently November 2010 · most notably 157 Cal. App. 4th 728 - Schmidlin v. City of Palo Alto (2008), 150 Cal. App. 4th 400 - HUONG QUE, INC. v. Luu (2007)

29 state decisions

2001988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 12 Cal. 3d 629 - Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'n · 17 Cal. 2d 23 - Elliott v. McCombs · Eisley v. Mohan · Estate of Reid · Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of Equalization

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party who challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support a particular finding must summarize the evidence on that point, favorable and unfavorable, and show how and why it is insufficient. [Citation.]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A way of necessity is an easement arising from an implied grant or implied reservation; it is of common-law origin and is supported by the rule of sound public policy that lands should not be rendered unfit for occupancy or successful cultivation. Such a way is the result of the application of the presumption that whenever a party conveys property, he conveys whatever is necessary for the beneficial use of that property and retains whatever is necessary for the beneficial use of land he still possesses....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The California rule is settled that a right-of-way of necessity arises by operation of law when it is established that (1) there is a strict necessity for the right-of-way as when the claimants' property is landlocked [citations] and (2) the dominant and servient tenements were under the same ownership at the time of the conveyance giving rise to the necessity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.