Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 CALAPP3D 470 - People v. Lemus

People v. Lemus’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2008 · most notably 23 Cal. 4th 978 - People v. Kraft (2000), 229 Cal. App. 3d 367 - People v. Cleaves (1991)

27 state decisions

130198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Rose v. Clark · 10 Cal. 3d 703 - People v. Sedeno · 25 Cal. 3d 668 - People v. Flannel · Connecticut v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “could have concluded that the particular facts underlying the instruction did exist.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in this specific context is defined as evidence which is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.