In re Marcus’s Empirical Analysis
203 F. 29 · 1913
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 1941
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Marcus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““'The special master hold that, so far as the evidence showed, the payment to ihe wife was for borrowed money due to her, and that, although the payment might have been preferential, it did not constitute a transfer or concealment with intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Feder v. Goetz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.