Popp v. Archbell’s Empirical Analysis
203 F.2d 287 · 1953
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2024
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Guaranty Trust Co. v. York · Kline v. Burke Construction Co. · Guaranty Trust Co. v. York · Angel v. Bullington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a state venue statute can have no application to courts of the United States.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(S)uing in the state court does not amount to an election between state and federal courts and ... the pendency of an action for damages in a state court does not preclude the plaintiff from suing on the same cause of action in the federal court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that where the action first brought is in personam and seeks only a personal judgment, another action for the same cause in another jurisdiction is not precluded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.