Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 F.2d 301 - O'Connor v. United States

O'Connor v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

203 F.2d 301 · 1953

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
September 2008
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2008

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

90195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4244 · 26 U.S.C. § 145 · 26 U.S.C. § 273

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There was, however, evidence tending to show that the property which appeared on the land records in the the names of husband and wife had actually been purchased with the defendant’s funds. The persons who negotiated the sales testified that they dealt with the defendant alone, and the settlement sheets made no reference to the wife but indicated that the properties were bought for the account of the defendant. Furthermore the defendant’s income returns for the years 1944 to 1946 showed that his wife had no income during this peri od; and when he took the stand as a witness he made no claim that his wife had contributed to the purchase price. She herself was not produced as a witness. * * * ” 203 F.2d 301, 303 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that he would or could have made any other defense than he did present, if the assessment had not been levied”). 4 . Mr. Thomas concedes he is currently unable to pay private counsel. See Def.’s 2d Mot. at 8. 5 . Mr. Thomas makes clear that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.