United States v. Debrow’s Empirical Analysis
203 F.2d 699 · 1953
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1621 · 2 U.S.C. § 191 · 28 U.S.C. § 525
Relies on Sinclair v. United States · Rosen v. United States · Bartell v. United States · Markham v. United States · Robertson v. Perkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Rule 2. Purpose and Construction. These rules are intended to provide for the just determination of every criminal proceeding. They shall be construed to secure simplicity in procedure, fairness in administration and the elimination of unjustifiable expense and delay.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.