Silvray Lighting, Inc. v. Kurt Versen, Trading Under the Firm Name and Style of Kurt Versen Company and Kurt Versen Company, a Corporation

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued April 21, 1953.

Decided April 29, 1953.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1953-04-29

2 counsel of record

Relies on Silvray Lighting, Inc. v. Versen

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1953-04-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2006

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; William F. Smith, Judge.

Floyd H. Crews, New York City (William S. Gluck, Darby & Darby, Russell G. Pelton, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Harry B. Rook, Newark, N. J. (Karl Huber, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellees.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Smith, 1952, 106 F.Supp. 90. We need add nothing to what has been so well stated in his analysis of the evidence and the applicable law.