Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 F.3d 442 - Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Paramount Liquor Co.

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Paramount Liquor Co.’s Empirical Analysis

203 F.3d 442 · 2000

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
September 2016
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1399 (§ 4219 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1401 (§ 4221 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1451 (§ 4301 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Kerotest Mfg Co v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co · Deakins v. Monaghan · Judith Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corporation Comprehensive Disability Protection Plan · Beverly Blair and Letressa Wilbon, on Behalf of Themselves and a Class of Others Similarly Situated v. Equifax Check Services, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “dismissal created an unwarranted risk of legal prejudice”); Asset Allocation & Mgmt. Co. v. W. Employers Ins. Co., 892 F.2d 566 , 571 (7th Cir.1989) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.