Lindstrom v. Graber’s Empirical Analysis
203 F.3d 470 · 2000
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2025
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3184 · 18 U.S.C. § 3186 · 18 U.S.C. § 3188 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n · Arthur Calderon Warden v. Charles Edward Moore · Terlinden v. Ames · United States v. Howard · Green v. Warden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Habeas corpus is the normal method of challenging an extradition order, such an order being unappealable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.