Brian Williams’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
11 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2021
11 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. · Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon · Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp. · Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Lai
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the FAA, a “court must stay proceedings if satisfied that the parties have agreed in writing to arbitrate an issue or issues underlying the district court proceeding.” McMahan Sec. Co. v. Forum Capital Markets, 35 F.3d 82 , 85 (2d Cir.1994) (citing 9 U.S.C. § 3 ). “ ‘[Questions of arbitrability must be addressed with a healthy regard for the federal policy favoring arbitration,’ and thus, ‘any doubts concerning the scope of arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor of arbitration.’ ” Armijo v. Prudential of America, 72 F.3d 793 , 797 (10th Cir.1995) (quoting Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614, 626 , 105 S.Ct. 3346 , 87 L.Ed.2d 444 (1985)).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he general consensus [is] that the phrase ‘arising out of’ should be given a broad reading such as 'originating from’ or 'growing out of or ‘flowing from’ or 'done in connection with’- — that is, it requires some causal connection to the injuries suffered, but does not require proximate cause in the legal sense.”) (quoting cases); Mid-Continent Cas. Co. v. Swift Energy Co., 206 F.3d 487, 496-500 (5th Cir.2000); Fibreboard Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 16 Cal.App.4th 492 , 20 Cal.Rptr.2d 376, 383 (1993) (explaining that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“I agree to arbitrate any dispute, claim or controversy that may arise between me and my firm, or a customer, or any other person, that is required to be arbitrated under the rules, constitutions or by-laws of the organization[ ] ... and that any arbitration award rendered against me may be entered as a judgment in any court of competent jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.