¶1 Jimmie Lee Cato appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Un *524 known Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) and the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cato v. Bondurant, No. 7:05-cv-00070-GEC (W.D. Va. Feb. 2 & Apr. 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED.