Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 F. Supp. 206 - Ray v. Compania Naviera Continental, SA

203 F. Supp. 206 - Ray v. Compania Naviera Continental, SA’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
August 1972
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp. · Rodriguez v. New York · Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc. · Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co. · Crumady v. the Joachim Hendrik Fisser

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Certainly the shipowner would not only object but would prohibit the dismantling of every piece of ship's gear, such as winches, lights, etc. in a professed effort by the stevedoring company to ascertain whether or not the ship's own appurtenances were seaworthy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ ■■ * * The pamphlet constitutes the ‘Bible’ of the stevedoring industry. Hence the court accepts section 9.25 as defining what is reasonably required in the trade. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Safety and Health Regulations for Longshoring,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.