Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 Ga. 388 - Waldrup v. Crane

Waldrup v. Crane’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Clark v. Wade (2001), Stills v. Johnson (2000)

3 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

22019481950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. Wallace · Lamar v. Harris · Bond v. Norwood · Morris v. Grant · Bently v. Terry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a clear and strong case must be made, and the terms of the contract, to have the effect of depriving him of his control, should be clear, definite, and unambiguous. Miller v. Wallace, 76 Ga. 479 ( 2 Am. St. R. 48 ); Looney v. Martin, 123 Ga. 209 ( 51 SE 304 ); Beavers v. Williams, 199 Ga. 113, 124 ( 33 SE2d 343 ).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “There should be, to have authorized the habeas corpus court to find that there was a gift, some evidence of the terms of the contract by which it was claimed that the father relinquished his authority and parental control over his infant son. There is no evidence to show that he agreed to relinquish that control during the years of the child's minority or for any particular period of time; or that he made any stipulation that anything should be done for the child by way of rearing it properly or educating it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It might properly be said, however, that the evidence introduced at the hearing, was wholly insufficient to show that the father is not now a fit and proper person to have the custody of his minor child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.