203 Ga. App. 330 - Gunter v. True’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 124 Ga. App. 394 - Smith v. Singleton · 180 Ga. App. 428 - Fidelity National Bank v. Reid · 169 Ga. App. 88 - Mitchell v. Ringson · 197 Ga. App. 860 - PANASONIC INDUSTRIAL COMPANY v. Hall · 170 Ga. App. 718 - Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e are aware of no case from any jurisdiction in which a guaranty which (1) was executed contemporaneously with a negotiable instrument, (2) was affixed thereto, and (3) applied exclusively to the obligation evidenced thereby was held to fall outside the ambit of the UCC merely because it was written on a separate sheet of paper. Rather, in those cases where a guaranty pertaining to a negotiable instrument has been held to fall outside the ambit of Arti- ele 8 of the UCC, the agreement creating it has truly been separate from the instrument itself, often encompassing other obligations or future extensions of credit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.