Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 Ill. 2d 26 - People v. Stehman

203 Ill. 2d 26 - People v. Stehman’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably 376 Ill. App. 3d 511 - People v. Allen (2007), 232 Ill. 2d 285 - People v. Bailey (2009)

4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

260200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Chimel v. California · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · New York v. Belton · Michigan v. Long

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[W]hen a policeman has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, he may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the passenger compartment of that automobile.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[A]n officer making a lawful custodial arrest may search the person of the arrestee and the area within his immediate control, into which the arrestee might reach in order to obtain a weapon or destroy evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “`The occupants of a vehicle cannot avoid the consequences of Belton merely by stepping outside of the vehicle as the officers approach. [Citation.]' Thomas [ v. State ], 761 So.2d [1010,] 1014 [(Fla.1999)]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.