Carson v. McDowell’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2009
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ford v. City of Hutchinson · Carp v. Board of County Commissioners · Baugh v. Rural High School District No. 5 · Armourdale State Bank v. City of Kansas City · City of Wichita v. Robb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“computed by excluding the first day and including the last day”), and Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a) (providing that “the day of the act, event or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included” and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Tillmon“`at least twenty (20) days shall elapse between the date of such publication and the date set for hearing,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.