Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 Kan. 54 - State v. Wright

State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
October 2005
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2005 · most notably State v. Rice (1997), State v. Gunzelman (1972)

29 state decisions

19019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Krulewitch v. United States · Odom v. United States · Miller v. Hudspeth · State v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We doubt if one of the best lawyers ever laid claim to having tried a case with absolute perfection. Any good lawyer, having finished the trial of a case, can think of errors that he could have avoided and also think of moves that might have improved his client’s chances. New trials cannot be granted for such reasons. An accused cannot be guaranteed a lawyer that will present a perfect trial. He can only be guaranteed a trial free of prejudicial error. . . .” (p. 56.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.