Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 La. 631 - McCann v. Todd

McCann v. Todd’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
3
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 75 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably Hayes v. Muller (1963), 950 So. 2d 641 - Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP (2007)

2 federal appellate · 75 state decisions

18019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Daily States Pub. Co. v. Uhalt · Consaul v. Cummings · Fletcher v. Fletcher · Daspit v. Sinclair Refining Co. · Ludeau v. Avoyelles Cotton Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The relations between joint adventures are assimilated to those of partners inter se. Ludeau v. Avoyelles Cotton Co., [ 164 La. 275 , 113 So. 846 ] supra. As respects the character of the business undertaken, the principal difference between a partnership and a joint adventure `is that, while a co-partnership is ordinarily formed for the transaction of a general business of a particular kind, a joint adventure is usually, but not necessarily, limited to a single transaction, although the business of conducting it to a successful termination may continue for a number of years.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “where an attorney retained in a case employs or procures the employment of another to assist him, as regards the division of fee, the agreement constitutes a joint venture or special partnership.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Attorneys who jointly undertake to prosecute or to defend a lawsuit are entitled, in the absence of any agreement to the contrary, to share equally in the compensation, and it is immaterial which attorney furnishes the most labor or skill....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.