Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

203 Mo. 573

State v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 14, 1907

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1907-05-14

— Row. David R. Eby, Judge. Where there is no bill of exceptions, and no error appearing in the record proper, the judgment will be affirmed. State v. Nicholas, 193 Mo. 214; State v. Sparks, 191 Mo. 162.

Affirmed · Decided 1907-05-14

BUBGESS, J.

¶1On the 5th day of October, 1905, the prosecuting attorney of Pike county filed an information, charging the defendant with burglary and larceny. The date of the alleged offense was the 28th day of June, 1905, the building entered was the warehouse of the Diamond Flour Manufacturing Co., and the property stolen was two faucets of the value of two dollars. At the February term, 1906, of said court, the defendant was tried and convicted, and his punishment assessed at three years imprisonment in the penitentiary for the burglary and two years for the larceny. He was granted an appeal.

¶2The defendant is not represented in this court. As there was no bill of exceptions filed, there is nothing before this court for review except the record proper, and that appears to be free from error.

¶3The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

All concur.
/203/mo/573 · .json · Public domain