Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

203 N.C. 498

166 S.E 313

Wilson v. . Allsbrook

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1932

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1932-11-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1973

1 state decisions

Relies on Evans v. Freeman. · Typewriter Co. v. . Hardware Co. · National Bank v. Winslow

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-11-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Civil action to restrain threatened foreclosure under third deed of trust, and for an accounting.

¶2On 21 April, 1930, plaintiffs executed a note to the defendant, E. L. White, for $694.16, secured by third mortgage, or third deed of trust, on plaintiffs' home and dairy, O. O. Allsbrook, employee of defendant's company, being named as trustee therein.

¶3At the February Term, 1932, New Hanover Superior Court, the cause was by consent referred to Hon. K. O. Burgwin to find the facts and report the same together with his conclusion of law to the court. It was further adjudged that the temporary restraining order be continued upon execution by the plaintiffs of an indemnity bond in the sum of $500; otherwise, the restraining order was to be dissolved and vacated if said bond was not furnished within ten days.

¶4The sale was thereafter had on 25 March as plaintiffs were unable to post the required bond, but the matter is still in custodia legis.

¶5The referee in his report states the account between the parties, but he fails to find whether the note secured by the third deed of trust, as alleged by plaintiffs, has been paid or was to be paid from rents collected by the defendant. Exception; overruled.

¶6From a judgment affirming the report of the referee, the plaintiffs appeal, assigning errors. After stating the case: From the pleadings, it would seem that plaintiffs are entitled to a finding on their allegation that the *499 note secured by the third deed of trust has been paid or was to be paid from rents collected by the defendant. Stockton v. Lenoir, 201 N.C. 88,158 S.E. 856, S. c., 198 N.C. 148, 150 S.E. 886; Parker Co. v. Bank,200 N.C. 441, 157 S.E. 419; Justice v. Coxe, 198 N.C. 263,151 S.E. 252; Bank v. Winslow, 193 N.C. 470, 137 S.E. 320; Typewriter Co. v.Hardware Co., 143 N.C. 97, 55 S.E. 417; Evans v. Freeman, 142 N.C. 61,54 S.E. 847; Gooch v. Vaughan, 92 N.C. 611. To this end, the order of confirmation will be vacated and the cause remanded for further proceedings as to justice appertains and as the rights of the parties may require.

¶7Error and remanded.

/203/nc/498 · .json · Public domain