Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 N.C. App. 675 - State v. Jarrett

203 N.C. App. 675 - State v. Jarrett’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Texas · City of Indianapolis v. Edmond · Illinois v. Lidster · State v. Wilkerson · 199 N.C. App. 236 - State v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Courts have previously identified a number of non-exclusive factors relevant to officer discretion and individual privacy, including: the checkpoint’s potential interference with legitimate traffic[]; whether police took steps to put drivers on notice of an approaching checkpoint]; whether the location of the checkpoint was selected by a supervising official, rather than by officers in the field[]; whether police stopped every vehicle that passed through the checkpoint, or stopped vehicles pursuant to a set pat-tem[]; whether drivers could see visible signs of the officers’ authority[]; whether police operated the checkpoint pursuant to any oral or written guidelines[]; whether the officers were subject to any form of supervision^; and whether the officers received permission from their supervising officer to conduct the checkpoint^]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[t]he first Brown factor-the gravity of the public concerns served by the seizure-analyzes the importance of the purpose of the checkpoint. This factor is addressed by first identifying the primary programmatic purpose ... and then assessing the importance of the particular stop to the public.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Under the second Brown prong-the degree to which the seizure advanced public interests-the trial court was required to determine 'whether”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.