Elliott v. Ehrlich’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
January 1998
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 606 (§ 406 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Dandridge v. Williams · King v. Smith · Vlandis v. Kline · Townsend v. Swank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he state's interest in administrative ease and certainty cannot save the conclusive presumption of the regulation from invalidity under the Due Process Clause where there are other reasonable and practicable means of establishing the pertinent facts of actual contribution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[s]tatutes creating a permanent irrebuttable presumption have long been disfavored under the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.