State v. Schlanger’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 2014
2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Barrett v. United States · United States v. Mendoza · Emich Motors Corporation v. General Motors Corporation · Brohawn v. Transamerica Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... For good cause shown the Court may, in accepting a plea of guilty, order that such plea not be evidential in any civil proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. La Russo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.