Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 N.J. Super. 59 - State v. Stevens

203 N.J. Super. 59 - State v. Stevens’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

2 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2010

2 district · 16 state decisions

801984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Prouse · Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co. · Logan v. Shealy · State v. Weleck · State v. Winne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A public servant is guilty of official misconduct when, with purpose to obtain a benefit for himself or another or to injure or to deprive another of a benefit: a. He commits an act relating to his office but constituting an unauthorized exercise of his official functions, knowing that such act is unauthorized or he is committing such act in an unauthorized manner; or b. He knowingly refrains from performing a duty which is imposed upon him by law or is clearly inherent in the nature of his office.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “if the actions set forth in [the] indictment [alleging official misconduct] constitute a breach of [an official] duty, whether broadly or narrowly described, the indictment is sufficient”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “That duty is essential to the preservation of a free society.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.