Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 N.Y. 351 - Aaron v. . Ward

Aaron v. . Ward’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2022 · most notably Tyson & Brother v. Banton (1927), Tyson Bro-United Theatre Ticket Offices v. Banton

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 38 state decisions

130191119201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedAaron v. Ward

Relationships

Relies on Munn v. Illinois · De Wolf v. . Ford · People v. . King · Hamilton v. . Third Avenue Railroad Co. · Gillespie v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the plaintiff might have been denied admission altogether to the defendant's bathhouse, ... the defendant having voluntarily entered into a contract with her admitting her to the premises and agreeing to afford facilities for bathing, her status became similar to that of a passenger of a common carrier or a guest of an innkeeper,” so that she, too, was entitled to recover emotional damages for”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “distinction between common carriers and innkeepers, who are obliged to serve all persons who seek accommodation from them, and the keepers of public places of amusement or resort, such as the bathhouse of the defendant, theaters, and the like .... [which] may discriminate and serve whom [they] pleasef],” but holding that the latter class of businesses”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.