Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 Okla. 129 - Murphy v. State Election Board

Murphy v. State Election Board’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2007
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “but must accord the language used by the Legislature, it being unambiguous, ... fair, reasonable, plain and ordinary import or meaning”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(c) Any person desiring to file as a candidate for any such [state or national] office who adopts, appropriates, uses or purloins the name of any person of State or national reputation, lining or dead, or of any hero, public official, military general, or any well-known individual or celebrity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.