Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 Okla. 356 - Coe v. State Election Board

Coe v. State Election Board’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
April 1988
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 1988

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

1001950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Application of Oklahoma Turnpike Authority · Musick v. State Ex Rel. Miles · School Dist. No. 25 v. Hodge · Crawford v. Corporation Commission · Lowden v. Luther

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * No certificate of party nomination shall be issued by the county election board before Thursday noon next lollowmg any primary elec tion, * * * “Any candidate for party nomination to county office may, at any time before noon Thursday next following the primary election, file with the secretary of the county election board his or her challenge of the correctness of the announced results of said primary election by filing with the secretary of the county election board, whose duty it is to canvass the returns in such a race, a written application requesting a. recount of the ballots, as to. one or more precincts in such county and where said application is accompanied by a cash deposit in the sum of not less than Two Hundred Fifty ($250.00) Dollars, for each county. It shall be the duty of said election board to order said recount and proceed with the same as herein provided. * * * ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.