Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 Okla. 680 - Hammer v. Baldwin

Hammer v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 1973
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pettis v. Johnston · Covington v. Fisher · Vinson v. Oklahoma City · Yahola Oil Co. v. Causey · Claussen v. Amberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * *. This requirement of the statute is mandatory and not directory. * * *. The failure to comply with section 9749, supra, in the filing of the notice of a demand for a tax deed with a tax sale certificate in the office of the county clerk whose duty it was to make a record of the fee and the amount necessary to redeem such sale, is not a mere irregularity, but is an omission of an important and essential step in the issuance of a tax deed in divesting an owner of his title to the land.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.