Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

203 Okla. 75

218 P.2d 366

Fore v. Fore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 1950

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1950-05-09

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1953

7 state decisions

Relies on Gooldy v. Hines

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1950-05-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against him in the trial court and on February 24, 1948, he filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances as stated in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P. 2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed and remanded, with directions.

¶2 The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to va *76 cate the judgment entered for the plaintiff below and enter judgment for the defendant below.

/203/okla/75 · .json · Public domain