Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 Or. 629 - Cannon v. Gladden

Cannon v. Gladden’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2019 · most notably Solem v. Helm (1983), 8 Cal. 3d 410 - In Re Lynch (1972)

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions — followed in 11 states

1301955196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weems v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is unthinkable, and shocking to the moral sense of all reasonable men as to what is right and proper, that in this enlightened age jurisprudence would countenance a situation where an offender, either on a plea or verdict of guilty to the charge of rape, could be sentenced to the penitentiary for a period of not more than 20 years, whereas if he were found guilty of the lesser offense of assault with intent to commit rape he could spend the rest of his days in the bastille." Cannon, 203 Or. at 632-33 , 281 P.2d 233 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"In order to justify the court in declaring punishment cruel and unusual with reference to its duration, the punishment must be so proportioned to the offense committed as to shock the moral sense of all reasonable men as to what is right and proper under the circumstances: Weems v. United States, supra."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"[t]here can be no question that a sentence may be excessive, even though within the maximum of the statute, but if excessive, it is within the power of the appellate court to enforce this provision of the Bill of Rights, and avoid the judgment so far as it is excessive."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.