203 Or. App. 191 - Freeman v. Stuart’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n a case that has gone to trial, the denial of a summary judgment motion is not reviewable on appeal unless the motion rested on a 'purely legal' contention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“That means that facts are not merely undisputed, but immaterial, such as a facial challenge to the constitutionality of a statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.