Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 SO2D 587 - State ex rel. Cochran v. Eakin

State ex rel. Cochran v. Eakin’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1995
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Golding, State Auditor v. SALTER · Wood v. Honeyman · Barnett v. Lollar · Betterson v. Stewart · Murphy v. Panther Oil & Grease Mfg. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We are not to be misunderstood as holding, as respects the expenditure of public funds, that any payment whatever it is, will be without any personal liability on the part of the officer if only the purpose of the payment was somewhere within the general field of his jurisdiction. A payment may be within that general field and yet so clearly and distinctly one which the officer could not lawfully make as to bar him from justification in taking the position that he did it in good faith and honest error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.