Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

203 So. 3d 192

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 26, 2016

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2016-10-26

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2019

5 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California · Gissendanner v. State · 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-10-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d 114 (Fla.2000); Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979). Affirmance is without prejudice for appellant to raise issues concerning the voluntariness of his plea in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The notice of appeal divested the trial court of jurisdiction to rule on appellant’s subsequently-filed pro se motion to withdraw plea. Copeland v. State, 867 So.2d 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (citing McCray v. State, 840 So.2d 274, 275 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)).

¶2Affirmed

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
/203/so3d/192 · .json · Public domain