Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 So. 3d 384 - Jones v. Stewart

203 So. 3d 384 - Jones v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP. · 605 So. 2d 1032 - Roberts v. Benoit · 775 So. 2d 1049 - Willis v. Medders · 866 So. 2d 228 - Hutchinson v. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, NO. 5747 · 673 So. 2d 585 - Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Decretal language is defined as the portion of a court's judgment or order that officially states ('decrees') what the court is ordering and generally starts with the formula 'It is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that ....'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “must name the party in favor of whom the ruling is ordered”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “the party against whom the ruling is ordered”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.