203 So. 3d 558 - Williams v. Muses, Ltd. 1’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 42
Relies on Woda Ivy Glen Ltd. Partnership v. Fayette County Board of Revision · 173 Wis. 2d 658 - In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Davison · 173 Wis. 2d 626 - Metropolitan Holding Co. v. Board of Review · Cottonwood Affordable Housing v. Yavapai County · Cascade Court Limited Partnership v. Noble
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In assessing affordable rental housing, the income approach is recommended. As defined in this Section, affordable rental housing means residential housing consisting of one or more rental units, the construction and/or rental of which is subject to Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 USC 42), the Home Investment Partnership Program under the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 USC 12741 et seq.), the Federal Home Loan Banks Affordable Housing Program established pursuant to the ^Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) of 1989 ( Public Law 101-73 ), or any other federal, state or similar program intended to provide affordable housing to persons of low or moderate income and the occupancy and maximum rental rates of such housing are restricted based on the income of the persons occupying such housing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.