D.R. v. J.R.’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 745 So. 2d 437 - DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAM. v. Benway · HP v. Department of Children and Families · 791 So. 2d 17 - GC v. Department of Children and Families · Department of Children and Families v. TT · C.R. v. Department of Children & Family Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The child shall not be sent, brought, or caused to be sent or brought into the receiving state until the appropriate public authorities in the receiving state shall notify the sending agency, in writing, to the effect that the proposed placement does not appear to be contrary to the interests of the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[N]otwithstanding the trial court's error, the children are not required to be immediately returned to Florida.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.