¶1The conviction is for burglary, and the punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the state penitentiary. Appellant entered a plea of guilty, and sought to obtain a suspended sentence. The facts proved are not brought up by the record, nor do we find any bills of exceptions. Motion for new trial complains of misconduct of the jury, but there is absence of any bills of exception or statement of facts disclosing the evidence upon which the trial judge overruled the motion. The record discloses no error, and the judgment is affirmed.
203 S.W. 1182
Esquivel v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided May 22, 1918
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1918-05-22
<p>Appeal from Criminal District Court, Nueces County; Walter E. Timón, Judge. Urbano</p> <p>Esquivel was convicted of burglary, and lie appeals.</p>
Affirmed · Decided 1918-05-22