Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 SW2D 548 - Henderson v. Applegate

Henderson v. Applegate’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 1974
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 1974

7 state decisions

301947195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wallis, Landes & Co. v. Stuart · Robertson v. Trammell · Bearden v. Texas Co. · 28 Tex. Civ. App. 391 - Duke v. Wheeler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The remedy herein provided is cumulative of that provided in Chapter 12 hereof, for the guardianship of persons of unsound mind and habitual drunkards, and may he resorted to without invoking the latter remedy””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “. . We know of no law in this state authorizing the appointment of a guardian ad litem in matters of a purely probate nature.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.