Meadows v. Russell’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 1999
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lasseter v. Blackwell · Roberts v. Carlisle · Smith v. Price · L. E. Whitham & Co. v. Briggs' Estate · Jones v. Gilliam
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““At the time of the death of a testator or testatrix title to the estate devised immediately vests in the devisees or legatees, and any portion of the estate not passing under the will vests immediately in the heirs at law of the testator or testatrix. R.C.S. of Texas 1925, Art. 3314. Under this statute and under the precedents of this state title to the property passing under a will vests in the beneficiaries under such will immediately upon the death of the maker of the will, and not in the executor. Jones v. Gilliam, Tex.Civ.App., 199 S.W. 694 ; Smith v. Price, Tex.Civ.App., 230 S.W. 836 ; Roberts v. Carlisle, Tex.Civ.App., 4 S.W.2d 144 . Of course it is true that if for any reason-the will should be denied admission to probate, the title passing to the beneficiaries would fail, and the estate would be distributed under the laws of descent and distribution. It follows from what we have said that the title to the one-tMrd interest in the 98 acres vested in appellant at the time of the death of the testatrix amd the passing of title was not deferred until the date of the order admitting the will to probate.’’ (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rowe v. Palmer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.