Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 SW3D 672 - Olden v. Commonwealth

Olden v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Ornelas v. United States · Estelle v. Williams · Adcock v. Commonwealth · Davis v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If supported by substantial evidence, the factual findings of the trial court shall be conclusive. When the findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence... the question necessarily becomes, whether the rule of law as applied to the established facts is or is not violated. The second prong involves a de novo review to determine whether the court's decision is correct as a matter of law. However, a reviewing court should take care both to review findings of historical fact only for clear error and to give due weight to inferences drawn from those facts by resident judges and local law enforcement officers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.