Ernest Gatewood v. State of North Carolina’s Empirical Analysis
203 U.S. 531 · 1906
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 2002 · most notably Hertz v. Woodman (1910), State of Missouri Hurwitz v. North (1926)
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Munn v. Illinois · Lawton v. Steele · Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co. · Alfred Booth v. People of the State of Illinois · Edmund Smiley v. State of Kansas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an establishment, nominally for the transaction of a stock exchange business, or business of similar character, but really for the registration of bets, or wagers, usually for small amounts, on the rise or fall of the prices of stocks, grain, oil, etc., there being no transfer or delivery of the stock or commodities nominally dealt in.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““It is elementary that, under such circumstances, we must follow the construction given by the state court, and test the constitutionality of the statute under that view.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.