In the Matter of George Moran’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 4 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2019
3 federal appellate · 4 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bates v. Clark · Rawlins v. State of Georgia · Wilson · Harding · Post v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the Legislature of Oklahoma had prescribed the method of selection, followed, that method would not have violated the Constitution or any law or treaty of the United States. If it did prescribe a different one, a departure from that was a violation of the territorial enactment alone.” 203 U. S. 104 , 27 Sup. Ct. 25 , 51 L. Ed. 105 . See, also, In re Wood, supra.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Connella v. Haskell““The fifth amendment, requiring the presentment or indictment of a grand jury, does not take up unto itself the local law as to how the grand jury should be made up and raise the latter to a constitutional requirement.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.