Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 Wis. 2d 66 - State v. Ross

203 Wis. 2d 66 - State v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
6
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably 223 Wis. 2d 777 - State v. Richard A. P. (1998), State v. Greybull (1998)

33 state decisions

1401996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Michigan v. Mosley · Davis v. United States · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] suspect must, by either an oral or written assertion or non-verbal conduct that is intended by the suspect as an assertion and is reasonably perceived by the police as such, inform the police that he or she wishes to remain silent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Through the exercise of [a suspect's] option to terminate questioning he [or she] can control the time at which questioning occurs, the subjects discussed, and the duration of the interrogation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'articulate his desire to have counsel present sufficiently clearly that a reasonable police officer in the circumstances would understand the statement to be a request for an attorney.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.