Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

204 A.2d 572

Ingram v. Ingram

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1964

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 1964-11-20

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1964-11-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1980

4 state decisions

20196419701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

QUINN, Associate Judge.

¶1This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to amend a final judgment for divorce in her favor. The first part of the motion sought relief on the basis of a clerical error and the second part sought deletion of the word “plaintiff” in that portion of the judgment awarding maintenance to the “plaintiff and the minor child of the parties.” A review of the record discloses that the clerical error was corrected and that the inclusion of the word “plaintiff” was in response to appellant’s prayers for relief.

¶2Appellant’s contentions are entirely lacking in substance and we regard the appeal as frivolous on its face.

¶3Appeal dismissed.

/204/a2d/572 · .json · Public domain