¶1Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the finding of the jury that defendant promised to pay plaintiffs a commission was against the weight of evidence, and that the promise, if made, was nudum pactum. Blaekmar, P. J., Jaycox and Kelby, JJ., concur; Manning and Young, JJ., vote for reversal and a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of evidence, but dissent as to the dismissal of the complaint.
204 A.D. 840
Eno v. Klein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1922
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1922-11-15
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1980
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1922-11-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →