204 Ala. 336
85 So 822
Decided June 3, 1920
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1920-06-03
Action by the Central Hardware Company against A. G. Anderson for rent and advances, in which attachment was levied upon certain real property which was claimed by Henry King. On second trial of the claim suit, there was judgment for plaintiff (85 South. 821), and claimant brings certiorari.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1937
2 state decisions
Relies on Abraham v. Nicrosi · Taliaferro v. Lane · King v. Central Hardware Co.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Reversed and remanded · Decided 1920-06-03
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 This court is of the opinion that the trial court committed error in admitting the record of the judgment recovered by plaintiff against defendant. Taliaferro v. Lane, 23 Ala. 369; Abraham v. Nicrosi, 87 Ala. 173, 6 South. 293. This question was not raised or adjudicated in this case on the former appeal. 200 Ala. 209, 75 South. 967.
¶2 Reversed and remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings in conformity herewith.