Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

204 Ala. 492

85 So 821

Ex Parte Lundy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1920

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1920-06-30

<p>Criminal law <(&wkey;438 — Photograph of deceased admissible.</p> <p>In a murder trial, photograph of deceased held, properly received in evidence.</p>

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1946

4 state decisions

Relies on Sanders v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Writ denied · Decided 1920-06-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

McCLELLAN, j.

¶1 The questions argued in the brief in support of the application for certiorari were correctly decided by the Court of. Appeals. 85 South. 819. The reference in the opinion of the Court of Appeals to the photograph of the deceased might be interpreted as casting doubt upon the correctness of the action of the trial court in admitting that photograph in evidence. The photo was properly received in evidence. Sanders v. State, 202 Ala. 37, 79 South. 375, 376.

¶2 Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
/204/ala/492 · .json · Public domain