Hall v. Castleberry’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1953
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bobo v. State · Lourance v. Lankford · Citizens Bank of Mammoth Spring v. Commercial National Bank of Chicago · King v. Clay · Miller Land & Lumber Co. v. Gurley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘The purpose of a nunc pro tunc order is to make the record reflect the transaction that actually occurred and as often announced by this court, “The authority of the court to amend its record by a nunc pro tunc order is to make it speak the truth, but not to make it speak what it did not speak, but ought to have spoken.” Lourance v. Lankford, 106 Ark. 470 , 153 S. W. 592 , Ann. Cas. 1915A, 520.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.